- Pop culture
- Writing tips
- Daily Crossword
- Word Puzzle
- Word Finder
- Word of the Day
- Synonym of the Day
- Word of the Year
- Language stories
- All featured
- Gender and sexuality
- All pop culture
- Grammar Coach ™
- Writing hub
- Grammar essentials
- Commonly confused
- All writing tips
- case in point
A relevant example or illustration of something, as in A case in point was the collision of a cyclist with a pedestrian crossing the designated bike path . [Mid-1700s]

Words Nearby case in point
- case history
- casein glue
The American Heritage® Idioms Dictionary Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

Definition of 'case in point'
Case in point in british english, examples of 'case in point' in a sentence case in point, browse alphabetically case in point.
- case grammar
- case history
- case illustrates
- case in point
- case involves
- case knives
- All ENGLISH words that begin with 'C'
Related terms of case in point
- a case in point
Quick word challenge
Quiz Review
Score: 0 / 5

Wordle Helper

Scrabble Tools


- Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
Definition of a case in point – Learner’s Dictionary
A case in point, translations of a case in point.
Get a quick, free translation!
Word of the Day
in the lap of the gods
used to say that a situation that cannot be controlled and depends only on good luck

Tucking in and pigging out (Eating phrasal verbs)

Learn more with +Plus
- Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
- Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
- Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
- Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
- English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
- English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
- English–Dutch Dutch–English
- English–French French–English
- English–German German–English
- English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
- English–Italian Italian–English
- English–Japanese Japanese–English
- English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
- English–Polish Polish–English
- English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
- English–Spanish Spanish–English
- Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
- Learner’s Dictionary Idiom
- Translations
- All translations
Add a case in point to one of your lists below, or create a new one.
{{message}}
Something went wrong.
There was a problem sending your report.
Synonyms of cases in point
- as in examples
- To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In
Thesaurus Definition of cases in point
Synonyms & Similar Words
- illustrations
- representatives
- indications
- cross sections
- exemplifications
- loci classici
- manifestations
Thesaurus Entries Near cases in point
cases in point
case studies
Cite this Entry
“Cases in point.” Merriam-Webster.com Thesaurus , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/cases%20in%20point. Accessed 1 Dec. 2023.
Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Can you solve 4 words at once?
Word of the day.
See Definitions and Examples »
Get Word of the Day daily email!
Games & Quizzes

“Case In Point” Meaning with Useful Examples in English
The phrase “case in point” is a common phrase you might hear during an everyday conversation or possibly see in writing. Here you will find the meaning of this phrase and the story behind its origin. You will also find examples of conversations/statements so you can see how the phrase is used properly in conversation, followed by some other ways you could say the phrase and convey the same thought.
Table of Contents
Case In Point
Case in point meaning.
The meaning of the phrase “case in point” is something or someone that is a good symbol or illustration of a prior fact previously mentioned.
Origin of the common idiomatic expression
This popular phrase was derived from a shorter phrase that was used many years ago. Derived from the French phrase a pointe, meaning relevant, the shorter form of the phrase “case in point” was simply “in point.” The phrase “in point” first appeared in 1658 and it was not sometime until the 1700s that the word case was added to the phrase to become “case in point.”
“Case In Point” Examples
Examples in statements.
A statement made in an entertainment magazine about a well-known actor.
- “Robin Williams made every movie he starred in better. Case in point : Mrs. Doubtfire and Aladdin.”
A statement made by a radio host about a band.
- “It is difficult to cover and song and make everyone love it as much as the original, but some bands can do it successfully. Case in point : The Sound of Silence by Disturbed.”
Examples in Conversation
A conversation between two friends working out at the gym.
- Friend 1: I am a firm believer that muscles do not make the man.
- Friend 2: Really? I think a man in good shape with muscles is highly attractive. Case in point: Jason Mamoa.
- Friend 1: To each their own, but I am still not convinced.
A conversation between two friends.
- Friend 1: I don’t think professional wrestlers should ever be actors.
- Friend 2: I don’t know. Some of them are good.
- Friend 1: Like who?
- Friend 2: Well, a good case in point would be The Rock, aka Dwayne Johnson. He has made some pretty great movies.
- Friend 1: That is true. I can’t argue with that one. He is such a good actor, I forgot he was a wrestler.
Other examples:
- Dash Riprock was an excellent and typical case in point .
- The key settlement policies are a case in point .
- Many professions feel they deserve higher pay, and nurses are a case in point .
Other Ways to Say “Case In Point”
There are numerous ways you can say “case in point” and still convey the same meaning. Other phrases you could use instead include for instance, for example or consider (insert name or thing here you want the person to consider).
Useful synonyms of “Case In Point”:
- Prime example
- Good example
- Good illustration
- Example of this
- For example
- Great example
Case In Point Meaning | Image

- Latest Posts
- Rapport Meaning: What Does the Term “Rapport” Mean? - November 28, 2023
- Solidarity Meaning: What’s the Definition of the Term “Solidarity”? - November 28, 2023
- Compassion Meaning: What Does “Compassion” Mean? - November 28, 2023
1 thought on ““Case In Point” Meaning with Useful Examples in English”
Great explanation! Thanks!

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

‘Case in Point' or 'Case and Point': What's the Difference?

Are you wondering whether to use ‘case in point’ or ‘case and point’? What’s the difference? And which is actually correct? We’ll cover that in this article, plus teach you how to use the correct phrase in a sentence.
Don’t feel like skimming? Here’s the short answer.
'Case in point' is the correct way to write the phrase. 'Case and point' is how it's commonly misspelled. Therefore, you should avoid using that spelling of the phrase in your writing.
‘Case in Point’ or ‘Case and Point’ – What’s the Difference?
The difference between these two is that ‘case in point’ is correct, and ‘case and point’ isn’t. Never use the latter in your writing.
Is the Correct Phrase ‘Case in Point’ or ‘Case and Point’?
Since you know the difference between these two phrases, you know that ‘case in point’ is the only correct way to say this phrase.
Definition and Meaning
Let’s break down what ‘case in point’ means. Well, we’ve got ‘in point,’ which is a pretty old phrase. It’s something called a fossil phrase, which is only found in an idiom and never really used on its own. ‘In point’ typically means something relevant or something important.
‘Case’ can refer to something that serves as an example, and ‘point’ refers to an idea that you try to make people understand or accept.
Therefore, the meaning of ‘case in point’ is: “an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed.”
The official Merriam-Webster definition is: “an illustrative, relevant, or pertinent case.”
How to Use the Phrase in a Sentence
Now that you know what the idiom means, let’s see how to use it in a sentence correctly.
- I knew we’d blow y’all out of the water. Last week’s game was a case in point.
- She said you were mean. The fact you left me without a ride is a case in point.
- The way you dress says a lot about your personality. Todd’s a slob. Case in point.
- I’m better at basketball than you. I win every time—case in point.
- I’m a stellar student. My grades are a case in point.
- My niece is a great driver. Her clean driving record is a case in point.
A Brief History
The term ‘case in point’ originates from the French term à point , which means something relevant to the point and dates all the way back to 1647. It was taken from the Anglo-Norman phrase en point , meaning the state or condition of something. It was used to refer to the examples of legal cases presented in the courts.
Concluding Thoughts on ‘Case in Point’ and ‘Case and Point’
Now that you know what ‘case in point’ means and the correct way to say (and write) the phrase, you can use the above examples to create your own sentences.
We’ve got a whole library of content dedicated to helping you understand the most common confusing words and phrases in the English language.
Learn More:
- ‘Incase' or 'In Case': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- ‘In Regard To' or 'In regards To': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- 'Wellbeing' or 'Well-Being': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- ‘Ms' vs 'Mrs.': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- ‘Compare to' vs 'Compare With': What's the Difference?
- ‘Margarita’ or ‘Margherita’: How to Spell ‘Margarita’ Correctly
- ‘Wheelbarrel’ or ‘Wheelbarrow’: How to Spell It Correctly
- ‘Year Old' or 'Years Old': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- 'Email' or 'E-mail': What's the Difference?
- 'Valentines Day' or 'Valentine's Day': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- 'To Much' or 'Too Much': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- ‘Buck Naked' or 'Butt Naked': Which Is It? Is There a Difference?
- ‘Emigrate' vs 'Immigrate': What's the Difference?
- 'Nowadays' or 'Now A Days': What's the Difference Between the Two?
- 'Photo Shoot' or 'Photoshoot': What's the Difference Between the Two?
Add new comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Post Comment

- Introduction
- Conclusions
- Article Information
ADHD indicates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; CVD, cardiovascular disease.
a Controls were derived from the same base cohort as the cases; thus, a case with a later date of CVD diagnosis could potentially serve as a control for another case in the study.
Crude odds ratios (ORs) were based on cases and controls matched on age, sex, and calendar time. Adjusted ORs (AORs) were based on cases and controls matched on age, sex, and calendar time and adjusted for country of birth, educational level, somatic comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and sleep disorders), and psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, conduct disorder, depressive disorder, eating disorders, intellectual disability, personality disorders, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders).
The solid lines represent the adjusted odds ratios, and the shaded areas represent the 95% CIs. In restricted cubic splines analysis, knots were placed at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of ADHD medication use.
eTable 1. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Codes from the Swedish National Inpatient Register
eTable 2. Type of Cardiovascular Disease in Cases
eTable 3. Risk of CVD Associated With ADHD Medication Use Across Different Average Defined Daily Doses
eTable 4. Risk of CVD Associated With Cumulative Duration of Use of Different Types of ADHD Medications
eTable 5. Sensitivity Analyses of CVD Risk Associated With Cumulative Use of ADHD Medications, Based On Different Cohort, Exposure, and Outcome Definitions
eFigure. Risk of CVD Associated With Cumulative Use of ADHD Medications, Stratified by Sex
Data Sharing Statement
- Long-Term Cardiovascular Effects of Medications for ADHD—Balancing Benefits and Risks of Treatment JAMA Psychiatry Editorial November 22, 2023 Samuele Cortese, MD, PhD; Cristiano Fava, MD, PhD
See More About
Select your interests.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
- Academic Medicine
- Acid Base, Electrolytes, Fluids
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Anesthesiology
- Anticoagulation
- Art and Images in Psychiatry
- Assisted Reproduction
- Bleeding and Transfusion
- Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
- Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography
- Climate and Health
- Clinical Challenge
- Clinical Decision Support
- Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Consensus Statements
- Coronavirus (COVID-19)
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cultural Competency
- Dental Medicine
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- Diagnostic Test Interpretation
- Drug Development
- Electronic Health Records
- Emergency Medicine
- End of Life
- Environmental Health
- Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
- Facial Plastic Surgery
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Genetics and Genomics
- Genomics and Precision Health
- Global Health
- Guide to Statistics and Methods
- Hair Disorders
- Health Care Delivery Models
- Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment
- Health Care Quality
- Health Care Reform
- Health Care Safety
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Disparities
- Health Inequities
- Health Informatics
- Health Policy
- History of Medicine
- Hypertension
- Images in Neurology
- Implementation Science
- Infectious Diseases
- Innovations in Health Care Delivery
- JAMA Infographic
- Law and Medicine
- Leading Change
- Less is More
- LGBTQIA Medicine
- Lifestyle Behaviors
- Medical Coding
- Medical Devices and Equipment
- Medical Education
- Medical Education and Training
- Medical Journals and Publishing
- Mobile Health and Telemedicine
- Narrative Medicine
- Neuroscience and Psychiatry
- Notable Notes
- Nutrition, Obesity, Exercise
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Occupational Health
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopedics
- Otolaryngology
- Pain Medicine
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Patient Care
- Patient Information
- Performance Improvement
- Performance Measures
- Perioperative Care and Consultation
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Pharmacoepidemiology
- Pharmacogenetics
- Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Physical Therapy
- Physician Leadership
- Population Health
- Professional Well-being
- Professionalism
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Health
- Public Health
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Regulatory Agencies
- Research, Methods, Statistics
- Resuscitation
- Rheumatology
- Risk Management
- Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine
- Shared Decision Making and Communication
- Sleep Medicine
- Sports Medicine
- Stem Cell Transplantation
- Substance Use and Addiction Medicine
- Surgical Innovation
- Surgical Pearls
- Teachable Moment
- Technology and Finance
- The Art of JAMA
- The Arts and Medicine
- The Rational Clinical Examination
- Tobacco and e-Cigarettes
- Translational Medicine
- Trauma and Injury
- Treatment Adherence
- Ultrasonography
- Users' Guide to the Medical Literature
- Vaccination
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Veterans Health
- Women's Health
- Workflow and Process
- Wound Care, Infection, Healing
Others Also Liked
- Download PDF
- Twitter Facebook More LinkedIn
Zhang L , Li L , Andell P, et al. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications and Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases. JAMA Psychiatry. Published online November 22, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.4294
Manage citations:
© 2023
- Permissions
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications and Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases
- 1 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 2 Unit of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 3 School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- 4 Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington
- 5 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington
- Editorial Long-Term Cardiovascular Effects of Medications for ADHD—Balancing Benefits and Risks of Treatment Samuele Cortese, MD, PhD; Cristiano Fava, MD, PhD JAMA Psychiatry
Question Is long-term use of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)?
Findings In this case-control study of 278 027 individuals in Sweden aged 6 to 64 years who had an incident ADHD diagnosis or ADHD medication dispensation, longer cumulative duration of ADHD medication use was associated with an increased risk of CVD, particularly hypertension and arterial disease, compared with nonuse.
Meaning Findings of this study suggest that long-term exposure to ADHD medications was associated with an increased risk of CVD; therefore, the potential risks and benefits of long-term ADHD medication use should be carefully weighed.
Importance Use of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications has increased substantially over the past decades. However, the potential risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with long-term ADHD medication use remains unclear.
Objective To assess the association between long-term use of ADHD medication and the risk of CVD.
Design, Setting, and Participants This case-control study included individuals in Sweden aged 6 to 64 years who received an incident diagnosis of ADHD or ADHD medication dispensation between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2020. Data on ADHD and CVD diagnoses and ADHD medication dispensation were obtained from the Swedish National Inpatient Register and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, respectively. Cases included individuals with ADHD and an incident CVD diagnosis (ischemic heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, thromboembolic disease, arterial disease, and other forms of heart disease). Incidence density sampling was used to match cases with up to 5 controls without CVD based on age, sex, and calendar time. Cases and controls had the same duration of follow-up.
Exposure Cumulative duration of ADHD medication use up to 14 years.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was incident CVD. The association between CVD and cumulative duration of ADHD medication use was measured using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs.
Results Of 278 027 individuals with ADHD aged 6 to 64 years, 10 388 with CVD were identified (median [IQR] age, 34.6 [20.0-45.7] years; 6154 males [59.2%]) and matched with 51 672 control participants without CVD (median [IQR] age, 34.6 [19.8-45.6] years; 30 601 males [59.2%]). Median (IQR) follow-up time in both groups was 4.1 (1.9-6.8) years. Longer cumulative duration of ADHD medication use was associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with nonuse (0 to ≤1 year: AOR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.93-1.06]; 1 to ≤2 years: AOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]; 2 to ≤3 years: AOR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.25]; 3 to ≤5 years: AOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.17-1.39]; and >5 years: AOR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.12-1.36]). Longer cumulative ADHD medication use was associated with an increased risk of hypertension (eg, 3 to ≤5 years: AOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.51-1.97] and >5 years: AOR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.55-2.08]) and arterial disease (eg, 3 to ≤5 years: AOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.45] and >5 years: AOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.96-2.32]). Across the 14-year follow-up, each 1-year increase of ADHD medication use was associated with a 4% increased risk of CVD (AOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.05]), with a larger increase in risk in the first 3 years of cumulative use (AOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]) and stable risk over the remaining follow-up. Similar patterns were observed in children and youth (aged <25 years) and adults (aged ≥25 years).
Conclusions and Relevance This case-control study found that long-term exposure to ADHD medications was associated with an increased risk of CVDs, especially hypertension and arterial disease. These findings highlight the importance of carefully weighing potential benefits and risks when making treatment decisions about long-term ADHD medication use. Clinicians should regularly and consistently monitor cardiovascular signs and symptoms throughout the course of treatment.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common psychiatric disorder characterized by developmentally inappropriate inattentiveness, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. 1 , 2 Pharmacological therapy, including both stimulants and nonstimulants, is recommended as the first-line treatment for ADHD in many countries. 1 , 3 The use of ADHD medication has increased greatly in both children and adults during the past decades. 4 Although the effectiveness of ADHD medications has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and other studies, 5 , 6 concerns remain regarding their potential cardiovascular safety. 7 Meta-analyses of RCTs have reported increases in heart rate and blood pressure associated with both stimulant and nonstimulant ADHD medications. 5 , 7 - 9
As RCTs typically evaluate short-term effects (average treatment duration of 75 days), 7 it remains uncertain whether and to what extent the increases in blood pressure and heart rate associated with ADHD medication lead to clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) over time. Longitudinal observational studies 10 - 12 examining the association between ADHD medication use and serious cardiovascular outcomes have emerged in recent years, but the findings have been mixed. A meta-analysis 13 of observational studies found no statistically significant association between ADHD medication and risk of CVD. However, the possibility of a modest risk increase cannot be ruled out due to several methodological limitations in these studies, including confounding by indication, immortal time bias, and prevalent user bias. Additionally, most of these studies had an average follow-up time of no more than 2 years. 13 , 14 Thus, evidence regarding the long-term cardiovascular risk of ADHD medication use is still lacking.
Examining the long-term cardiovascular risk associated with ADHD medicine use is clinically important given that individuals with a diagnosis of ADHD, regardless of whether they receive treatment, face an elevated risk of CVD. 15 Additionally, a substantial proportion of young individuals with ADHD continues to have impairing symptoms in adulthood, 16 necessitating prolonged use of ADHD medication. Notably, studies have indicated a rising trend in the long-term use of ADHD medications, with approximately half of individuals using ADHD medication for over 5 years. 17 Furthermore, evidence is lacking regarding how cardiovascular risk may vary based on factors such as type of CVD, type of ADHD medication, age, and sex. 13 Therefore, there is a need for long-term follow-up studies to address these knowledge gaps and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the cardiovascular risks associated with ADHD medication use. This information is also crucial from a public health perspective, particularly due to the increasing number of individuals receiving ADHD medications worldwide. 4
This study aimed to assess the association between cumulative use of ADHD medication up to 14 years and the risk of CVD by using nationwide health registers in Sweden. We hypothesized that longer cumulative use of ADHD medication would be associated with increased CVD risk. In addition, we aimed to examine whether the associations differ across types of ADHD medication, types of CVD, sex, and age groups.
We used data from several Swedish nationwide registers linked through unique personal identification numbers. 18 Diagnoses were obtained from the National Inpatient Register, 19 which contains data on inpatient diagnoses since 1973 and outpatient diagnoses since 2001. Information on prescribed medications was retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, which contains all dispensed medications in Sweden since July 2005 and includes information on drug identity based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, 20 dispensing dates, and free-text medication prescriptions. Socioeconomic factors were obtained from the Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labour Market studies. 21 Information on death was retrieved from the Swedish Cause of Death Register, 22 which contains information on all deaths since 1952. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Informed patient consent is not required for register-based studies in Sweden. The study followed the Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data–Pharmacoepidemiological Research ( RECORD-PE ) guideline. 23
We conducted a nested case-control study of all individuals residing in Sweden aged 6 to 64 years who received an incident diagnosis of ADHD or ADHD medication dispensation 15 between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2020. The diagnosis of ADHD ( International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision [ ICD-10 ] code F90) was identified from the National Inpatient Register. Incident ADHD medication dispensation was identified from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and was defined as a dispensation after at least 18 months without any ADHD medication dispensation. 24 Baseline (ie, cohort entry) was defined as the date of incident ADHD diagnosis or ADHD medication dispensation, whichever came first. Individuals with ADHD medication prescriptions for indications other than ADHD 25 and individuals who emigrated, died, or had a history of CVD before baseline were excluded from the study. The cohort was followed until the case index date (ie, the date of CVD diagnosis), death, migration, or the study end date (December 31, 2020), whichever came first.
Within the study cohort, we identified cases as individuals with an incident diagnosis of any CVD (including ischemic heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, thromboembolic disease, arterial disease, and other forms of heart disease; eTable 1 in Supplement 1 ) during follow-up. For each case, the date of their CVD diagnosis was assigned as the index date. Using incidence density sampling, 26 up to 5 controls without CVD were randomly selected for each case from the base cohort of individuals with ADHD. The matching criteria included age, sex, and calendar time, ensuring that cases and controls had the same duration of follow-up from baseline to index date. Controls were eligible for inclusion if they were alive, living in Sweden, and free of CVD at the time when their matched case received a diagnosis of CVD, with the index date set as the date of CVD diagnosis of the matched case ( Figure 1 ). Controls were derived from the same base cohort as the cases. Thus, a case with a later date of CVD diagnosis could potentially serve as a control for another case in the study. 26
The main exposure was cumulative duration of ADHD medication use, which included all ADHD medications approved in Sweden during the study period, including stimulants (methylphenidate [ATC code N06BA04], amphetamine [ATC code N06BA01], dexamphetamine [ATC code N06BA02], and lisdexamfetamine [ATC code N06BA12]) as well as nonstimulants (atomoxetine [ATC code N06BA09] and guanfacine [ATC code C02AC02]). Duration of ADHD medication use was derived from a validated algorithm that estimates treatment duration from free text in prescription records. 25 The cumulative duration of ADHD medication use was calculated by summing all days covered by ADHD medication between baseline and 3 months prior to the index date. The last 3 months before the index date were excluded to reduce reverse causation, as clinicians’ perception of potential cardiovascular risks may influence ADHD medication prescription. This time window was chosen because routine psychiatric practice in Sweden limits a prescription to a maximum 3 months at a time. 27 Individuals with follow-up of less than 3 months were excluded.
We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between cumulative durations of ADHD medication use and incident CVD. Crude ORs were adjusted for all matching variables (age, sex, and calendar time) by design. Adjusted ORs (AORs) were additionally controlled for country of birth (Sweden vs other), highest educational level (primary or lower secondary, upper secondary, postsecondary or postgraduate, or unknown; individuals aged <16 years were included as a separate category), and diagnoses of somatic (type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and sleep disorders) and psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, conduct disorder, depressive disorder, eating disorders, intellectual disability, personality disorders, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders; eTable 1 in Supplement 1 ) before baseline. The association between cumulative ADHD medication use and incident CVD was assessed using both continuous and categorical measures (no ADHD medication use, 0 to ≤1, 1 to ≤2, 2 to ≤3, 3 to ≤5, and >5 years). To capture potential nonlinear associations, we used restricted cubic splines to examine ADHD medication use as a continuous measure throughout follow-up. 28 The associations were examined in the full sample and stratified by age at baseline, that is, children or youth (<25 years old) and adults (≥25 years old). Furthermore, to evaluate the association with dosage of ADHD medication, we estimated the risk of CVD associated with each 1-year increase in use of ADHD medication across different dosage groups categorized by the average defined daily dose (DDD; for instance, 1 DDD of methylphenidate equals 30 mg) during follow-up. 29
In subgroup analyses, we examined the associations between ADHD medication use and specific CVDs, including arrhythmias, arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and thromboembolic disease (eTable 1 in Supplement 1 ). Additionally, we investigated the associations with CVD risk for the most commonly prescribed ADHD medications in Sweden, ie, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and atomoxetine, while adjusting for other ADHD medication use. We also examined sex-specific associations.
To further examine the robustness of our findings, we conducted 4 sensitivity analyses. First, we restricted the sample to ever users of ADHD medication to reduce unmeasured confounding between ADHD medication users and nonusers. Second, we assessed ADHD medication exposure over the entire follow-up period without excluding the 3 months prior to the index date. Third, to capture fatal cardiovascular events, we additionally included death by CVD in the outcome definition. Finally, we constructed a conditional logistic regression model that adjusted for propensity scores of ADHD medication use. Data management was performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) and all analyses were performed using R, version 4.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
The study cohort consisted of 278 027 individuals with ADHD aged 6 to 64 years. The incidence rate of CVD was 7.34 per 1000 person-years. After applying exclusion criteria and matching, the analysis included 10 388 cases (median [IQR] age at baseline, 34.6 (20.0-45.7) years; 6154 males [59.2%] and 4234 females [40.8%]) and 51 672 matched controls (median [IQR] age at baseline, 34.6 [19.8-45.6] years; 30 601 males [59.2%] and 21 071 females [40.8%]) ( Figure 1 and Table 1 ). Median (IQR) follow-up in both groups was 4.1 (1.9-6.8) years. Among the controls, 3363 had received a CVD diagnosis after their index dates. The most common types of CVD in cases were hypertension (4210 cases [40.5%]) and arrhythmias (1310 cases [12.6%]; eTable 2 in Supplement 1 ). Table 1 presents the sociodemographic information and somatic and psychiatric comorbidities in cases and controls. In general, cases had higher rates of somatic and psychiatric comorbidities and a lower level of educational attainment compared with controls.
A similar proportion of cases (83.9%) and controls (83.5%) used ADHD medication during follow-up, with methylphenidate being the most commonly dispensed type, followed by atomoxetine and lisdexamfetamine. Longer cumulative duration of ADHD medication use was associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with nonuse (0 to ≤1 year: AOR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.93-1.06]; 1 to ≤2 years: AOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]; 2 to ≤3 years: AOR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.25]; 3 to ≤5 years: AOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.17-1.39]; and >5 years: AOR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.12-1.36]) ( Figure 2 ). The restricted cubic spline model suggested a nonlinear association, with the AORs increasing rapidly for the first 3 cumulative years of ADHD medication use and then becoming stable thereafter ( Figure 3 ). Throughout the entire follow-up, each 1-year increase in the use of ADHD medication was associated with a 4% increased risk of CVD (AOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.05]), and the corresponding increase for the first 3 years was 8% (AOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]). We observed similar results when examining children or youth and adults separately ( Figure 2 ). The restricted cubic spline model suggested a similar nonlinear association, with higher AORs in children or youth than in adults, but the 95% CIs largely overlapped ( Figure 3 ). Furthermore, similar associations were observed for females and males (eFigure in Supplement 1 ). The dosage analysis showed that the risk of CVD associated with each 1 year of ADHD medication use increased with higher average DDDs. The risk was found to be statistically significant only among individuals with a mean dose of at least 1.5 times the DDD (eTable 3 in Supplement 1 ). For example, among individuals with a mean DDD of 1.5 to 2 or less (eg, for methylphenidate, 45 to ≤60 mg), each 1-year increase in ADHD medication use was associated with a 4% increased risk of CVD (AOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]). Among individuals with a mean DDD >2 (eg, for methylphenidate >60 mg), each 1-year increase in ADHD medication use was associated with 5% increased risk of CVD (AOR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.06]).
When examining the risk for specific CVDs, we found that long-term use of ADHD medication (compared with no use) was associated with an increased risk of hypertension (AOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.51-1.97] for 3 to ≤5 years; AOR, 1.80 [95% CI 1.55-2.08] for >5 years) ( Table 2 ), as well as arterial disease (AOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.45] for 3 to ≤5 years; AOR, 1.49 [95% CI 0.96-2.32] for >5 years). However, we did not observe any statistically significant increased risk for arrhythmias, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, thromboembolic disease, or cerebrovascular disease ( Table 2 ). Furthermore, long-term use of methylphenidate (compared with no use) was associated with an increased risk of CVD (AOR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.31] for 3 to ≤5 years; AOR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.31]) for >5 years; eTable 4 in Supplement 1 ). Compared with no use, lisdexamfetamine was also associated with an elevated risk of CVD (AOR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.05-1.44] for 2 to ≤3 years; AOR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.98-1.40] for >3 years), while the AOR for atomoxetine use was significant only for the first year of use (1.07 [95% CI 1.01-1.13]; eTable 4 in Supplement 1 ).
In sensitivity analyses, we observed a similar pattern of estimates when the analysis was restricted to ever users of ADHD medications. Significantly increased risk of CVD was found when comparing ADHD medication use for 1 year or less with use for 3 to 5 or less years (AOR, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.18-1.38) or for use for more than 5 years (AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.13-1.36]) (eTable 5 in Supplement 1 ). When assessing ADHD medication use across the entire follow-up period, and compared with no use, the pattern of estimates was similar to the main analysis (3 to ≤5 years: AOR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18-1.39]; >5 years: AOR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.14-1.37]) (eTable 5 in Supplement 1 ). The analysis that included cardiovascular death as a combined outcome also had results similar to the main analysis. Moreover, when adjusting for propensity scores of ADHD medication use, the findings remained consistent (eTable 5 in Supplement 1 ).
This large, nested case-control study found an increased risk of incident CVD associated with long-term ADHD medication use, and the risk increased with increasing duration of ADHD medication use. This association was statistically significant both for children and youth and for adults, as well as for females and males. The primary contributors to the association between long-term ADHD medication use and CVD risk was an increased risk of hypertension and arterial disease. Increased risk was also associated with stimulant medication use.
We found individuals with long-term ADHD medication use had an increased risk of incident CVD in a dose-response manner in the first 3 years of cumulative ADHD medication use. To our knowledge, few previous studies have investigated the association between long-term ADHD medication use and the risk of CVD with follow-up of more than 2 years. 13 The only 2 prior studies with long-term follow-up (median, 9.5 and 7.9 years 30 , 31 ) found an average 2-fold and 3-fold increased risk of CVD with ADHD medication use compared with nonuse during the study period, yet 1 of the studies 30 included only children, and participants in the other study 31 were not the general population of individuals with ADHD (including those with ADHD and long QT syndrome). Furthermore, both studies were subject to prevalent user bias. Results from the current study suggest that the CVD risk associated with ADHD medication use (23% increased risk for >5 years of ADHD medication use compared with nonuse) is lower than previously reported. 30 , 31 Furthermore, we observed that the increased risk stabilized after the first several years of medication use and persisted throughout the 14-year follow-up period.
The association between ADHD medication use and CVD was significant for hypertension and arterial disease, while no significant association was observed with other types of cardiovascular events. To our knowledge, only 1 previous study 12 has examined the association between ADHD medication use and clinically diagnosed hypertension, and it found an increased risk, although the increase was not statistically significant. Furthermore, increased blood pressure associated with ADHD medication use has been well documented. 7 , 9 One study 32 found that blood pressure was mainly elevated during the daytime, suggesting that the cardiovascular system may recover at night. However, the cross-sectional nature of that study cannot preclude a long-term risk of clinically diagnosed hypertension associated with ADHD medication use. We also identified an increased risk for arterial disease. To date, no previous study has explored the association between ADHD medication use and arterial disease. A few studies have reported that ADHD medication may be associated with changes in serum lipid profiles, but the results were not consistent. 33 , 34 Further research is needed on the potential implications of ADHD medications for individuals’ lipid profiles. We did not observe any association between ADHD medication use and the risk of arrhythmias. A recent systematic review of observational studies of ADHD medication use reported an elevated risk of arrhythmias, but the finding was not statistically significant. 13 A review of RCTs also found that the use of stimulants was associated with an average increase in heart rate of 5.7 beats/min, 9 but no evidence of prolonged QT interval or tachycardia was found based on electrocardiograms. 7 Additionally, it is worth noting that some individuals receiving ADHD medications might be prescribed antiarrhythmic β-blockers to alleviate palpitation symptoms, thus potentially attenuating an association between ADHD medications and arrhythmias. Nevertheless, the absence of an association between ADHD medication use and clinically diagnosed arrhythmias in the present study does not rule out an increased risk for mild arrhythmias or subclinical symptoms, as palpitations and sinus tachycardia are not routinely coded as arrhythmia diagnoses. Further research is necessary to replicate our findings.
Regarding types of ADHD medication, findings of the present study suggest that increasing cumulative durations of methylphenidate and lisdexamfetamine use were associated with incident CVD, while the associations for atomoxetine were statistically significant only for the first year of use. Previous RCTs have reported increased blood pressure and heart rate with methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and atomoxetine, 5 , 35 , 36 but the mechanisms behind these adverse effects are still a topic of debate; there might be differences in cardiovascular adverse effects in stimulants vs nonstimulants. 37
We found that the association between cumulative duration of ADHD medication use and CVD was similar in females and males. Previous investigations exploring sex-specific association found higher point estimates in females, although the differences were not statistically significant. 13 Research has indicated that females diagnosed with ADHD may demonstrate different comorbidity patterns and potentially have different responses to stimulant medications compared with males. 38 - 40 Therefore, additional studies are needed to explore and better understand the potential sex-specific differences in cardiovascular responses to ADHD medications.
A strength of this study is that data on ADHD medication prescriptions and CVD diagnoses were recorded prospectively, so the results were not affected by recall bias. The findings should, however, be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, our approach for identification of patients with CVD was based on recorded diagnoses and there could be under ascertainment of cardiovascular diagnoses in the registers used. This means that some controls may have had undiagnosed CVD that did not yet require medical care, which would tend to underestimate associations between ADHD medication use and CVD. Second, exposure misclassification may have occurred if patients did not take their medication as prescribed. This misclassification, if nondifferential, would tend to reduce ORs such that the estimates we observed were conservative. Third, while we accounted for a wide range of potential confounding variables, considering the observational nature of the study and the possibility of residual confounding, we could not prove causality. It is possible that the association observed might have been affected by time-varying confounders. For example, other psychotropic medications and lifestyle factors could have affected both ADHD medication use and the occurrence of cardiovascular events. 41 , 42 Confounding by ADHD severity is also a potential factor to consider, as individuals with more severe ADHD symptoms may have more comorbidities and a less healthy lifestyle, which could affect the risk of CVD. Fourth, the study did not examine the risk of CVD among individuals with preexisting CVD. Individuals with preexisting CVD represent a distinct clinical group that requires careful monitoring; thus, evaluating the risk among them necessitates a different study design that carefully considers the potential impact of prior knowledge and periodic monitoring. Finally, the results by type of ADHD medication and type of CVD need to be replicated by studies with larger sample sizes.
The results of this population-based case-control study with a longitudinal follow-up of 14 years suggested that long-term use of ADHD medication was associated with an increased risk of CVD, especially hypertension and arterial disease, and the risk was higher for stimulant medications. These findings highlight the importance of carefully weighing potential benefits and risks when making treatment decisions on long-term ADHD medication use. Clinicians should be vigilant in monitoring patients, particularly among those receiving higher doses, and consistently assess signs and symptoms of CVD throughout the course of treatment. Monitoring becomes even more crucial considering the increasing number of individuals engaging in long-term use of ADHD medication.
Accepted for Publication: August 29, 2023.
Published Online: November 22, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.4294
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License . © 2023 Zhang L et al. JAMA Psychiatry .
Corresponding Authors: Zheng Chang, PhD ( [email protected] ) and Le Zhang, PhD ( [email protected] ), Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.
Author Contributions: Dr Zhang and Prof Chang had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Zhang, Johnell, Larsson, Chang.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Zhang, Li, Andell, Garcia-Argibay, Quinn, D'Onofrio, Brikell, Kuja-Halkola, Lichtenstein, Johnell, Chang.
Drafting of the manuscript: Zhang.
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Zhang, Li.
Obtained funding: Larsson, Chang.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Garcia-Argibay, D'Onofrio, Kuja-Halkola, Lichtenstein, Chang.
Supervision: Andell, Lichtenstein, Johnell, Larsson, Chang.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Larsson reported receiving grants from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Evolan, and Medici Medical Ltd outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (2019-01172 and 2022-01111) (Dr Chang) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 965381 (Dr Larsson).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2 .
- Register for email alerts with links to free full-text articles
- Access PDFs of free articles
- Manage your interests
- Save searches and receive search alerts
'The Masked Singer': Who Is Cow? Ken Jeong Says 'All Signs Point to Usher!' | Exclusive Video
Posted: November 29, 2023 | Last updated: November 29, 2023
It's disco night on "The Masked Singer" this week, and panelist Ken Jeong is fully convinced that Usher is in the singing competition's club with his homies.
And we do mean fully, in this case. In TheWrap's exclusive sneak peek at Wednesday night's episode, Jeong -- who apparently "can treat a Saturday Night Fever" -- is more confident than ever with his guess, arguing that all the clues of the apron-wearing cow line up to indicate the "Yeah!" singer is underneath the mask.
"You know what? Real talk, I know exactly who this is," Jeong says with his usual bravado. "Because all signs point to Usher."
You can watch TheWrap's exclusive clip of the episode above.
Jeong connects the singer to Donnie Wahlberg, as they both performed at the Michael Jackson memorial, and argues that Cow's football-related clue is a clear reference to "The Faculty," in which Usher starred as a football player named Gabe Santora.
For once, Jeong's guess isn't met with boos. As the audience takes it in, fellow panelist Nicole Scherzinger admits that she doesn't think it's a bad guess. Regardless of who it is though, panelist Robin Thicke thinks they're "dairy, dairy good."
Disco night on "The Masked Singer" will kick off with a special performance by the legendary disco band The Trammps, before Group A returns for their final competition.
At the end of the night, two contestants will be unmasked, unless the panel uses the Ding Dong Keep It On Bell.
"The Masked Singer" airs on Wednesdays at 8 p.m. ET on Fox.
The post 'The Masked Singer': Who Is Cow? Ken Jeong Says 'All Signs Point to Usher!' | Exclusive Video appeared first on TheWrap .
More for You
I'm a doctor and my healthy 16-year-old daughter died suddenly from the flu
WATCH: Karine Jean-Pierre storms out of White House press briefing when pressed by African reporter
Russia Issues Ominous Warning About 'Next Victim'
Texas woman creates first HBCU doll line, now sold at Walmart and Target
A powerful solar eruption headed for Earth could trigger a strong geomagnetic storm by Friday and stunning aurora across Canada
The Russians Just Blew Up A Hard-To-Replace Ukrainian Attack Jet. Too Bad For Them, It Was A Fake.
Kentucky reaches a new low in white Christian nationalism
Enough Is Enough: Cowboys-Seahawks Thriller Marred by Poor Officiating
Major New Conflict May Be Brewing on America's Doorstep
Between Friends by Sandra Bell-Lundy
Common Blood Pressure Drug Increases Lifespan, Slows Aging in Animals
Satellite photos show how the US Air Force is reclaiming a WWII-era airfield from the jungle to prepare to dodge Chinese missiles
Clinton class at Columbia disrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters chanting, 'Hillary, you can't hide'
How to speak to someone with dementia
The worst teams to make the NFL playoffs
Republican Threatens 'Consequences' As Meeting Descends Into Chaos
Sherman's Lagoon by Jim Toomey
New report says the IDF's elite intelligence unit saw signs Hamas was preparing a terror attack
Jesse Watters: Now we have proof Biden lied
NBC's Antonia Hylton, 30, diagnosed with rare cancer after dismissing these early signs

Case in Point or Case and Point – What’s the Difference?
Home » Case in Point or Case and Point – What’s the Difference?
Idioms are a great way to add color to your writing. They can make dry topics seem more relatable, and they help you navigate the daunting world of professional correspondence by signaling familiarity and approachability to coworkers or subordinates.
If you are going to use idioms , though, you had better be sure to get them right. Botching a common expression is a surefire way to lose credibility in the eyes of your readers. One phrase, in particular, is often misused: case in point . Or is it case and point? Read on to learn the truth.
What is the Difference Between Case in Point and Case and Point?
In this post, I will compare case in point vs. case and point . I will outline which of these is the correct expression and use it in its proper context with example sentences.
I will also show you a mnemonic device that can help you choose the correct phrase any time you use it in your own writing.
When to Use Case in Point

- “The way you dress communicates a lot about your personality, case in point, Todd’s sloppy outfit today,” said Todd’s boss.
- It’s not hard to find a job if you are willing to work. Case in point, my office is hiring right now.
- The harder you work, the more successful you will be; Frederick Douglass is a case in point.
- A case in point involved the FBI, which last year paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for a solution to crack an iPhone that had been used by a terrorist in the San Bernardino, Calif., mass shootings in 2015. – The Washington Post
For a more full discussion on the origin of case in point , see here .
When to Use Case and Point
What does case and point mean? Case and point is a misspelling of the expression case in point . It is considered a spelling error.
Below, you can see a graph of that charts the usage of case and point vs. case in point:

As you can see, almost no one uses case and point . Its use barely registers a blip over the last 200 years on English writing.
Trick to Remember the Difference

You should always choose case in point . It is the correct version of this idiom and has been since roughly 1647.
To remember to use case in point , imagine a skilled rhetorician putting the sharp point of his expository blade inside a case after he is done excoriating someone. The point is in the case.
Another way to look at it is that you poking a hole in someone’s argument. This mental image will help you remember that case in point is the correct form of this phrase.
Is it case in point or case and point? Case in point and case and point are different spellings of the same phrase, which means an example that supports one’s argument .
- Case in point is correct.
- Case and point is a spelling error.
If you have any other questions, be sure to check this site for help with other writing topics.

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
: an illustrative, relevant, or pertinent case Examples of case in point in a Sentence Recent Examples on the Web The sector, which was riding high through the COVID-19 pandemic, is starting to see customers pulling back on spending—and Richemont is a case in point.
A CASE IN POINT definition: 1. an example that shows that what you are saying is true or helps to explain why you are saying…. Learn more.
a case in point meaning: 1. an example that shows that what you are saying is true or helps to explain why you are saying…. Learn more.
phrase If you say that something is a case in point, you mean that it is a good example of something you have just mentioned . In many cases religious persecution is the cause of people fleeing their country. A case in point is colonial India. See full dictionary entry for case Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's Dictionary.
A CASE IN POINT definition: a good example of something: . Learn more.
The common phrase "case in point" simply means example or instance. You would use it to illustrate a certain situation or a core principle, or even an argument. You've probably seen it used mostly to refer to something that proves or supports a particular point.
Case in point definition: . See examples of CASE IN POINT used in a sentence.
The Guardian (2021) Case in point are these two lovely timber-and-stone retreats, each sleeping two. Times, Sunday Times (2016) His mode of relaxation on days off is another case in point. Times, Sunday Times (2006) Let us take the zip as a perfect case in point. Times, Sunday Times (2007) Let us take the roast potato as a classic case in point.
a case in point meaning: a good example of something: . Learn more.
case in point: 1 n an example that is used to justify similar occurrences at a later time Synonyms: precedent Type of: example , illustration , instance , representative an item of information that is typical of a class or group
Definition:A relevant example of something. Origin of Case in Point This expression originally was shorter; it was simply in point. It comes from the French expression a pointe. The French meaning was something relevant and to the point.
Outside the courtroom, a case in point is something that illustrates a message perfectly. The following sentences are cases in point because they use the phrase correctly: The issue of state aid, which is expected to be the subject of a major clash, was a case in point, she said. (The Guardian)
an instance or example that illustrates what is being discussed. See also: case, point Farlex Partner Idioms Dictionary © Farlex 2017 a case in ˈpoint a clear example of the problem, situation, etc. that is being discussed: Many of the students are from Latin America. Carlos is a case in point — he's from Colombia.
Synonyms for CASE IN POINT: example, illustration, case, sample, specimen, representative, prototype, indication, instance, cross section
Britannica Dictionary definition of CASE IN POINT. [singular] : a specific example used to show that something you have said is true. He spends a lot of money on unnecessary things. A case in point is his collection of rare sports cars. CASE IN POINT meaning: a specific example used to show that something you have said is true.
Synonyms for CASES IN POINT: examples, cases, illustrations, specimens, samples, representatives, prototypes, indications, instances, exemplars
The meaning of the phrase "case in point" is something or someone that is a good symbol or illustration of a prior fact previously mentioned. Origin of the common idiomatic expression This popular phrase was derived from a shorter phrase that was used many years ago.
A case in point is a phrase commonly used in English language to highlight or illustrate a specific example or instance that supports or proves a particular argument or point. It is often used to provide evidence or support for a general statement or claim. Basic Definition Of "A Case In Point"
Noun 1. case in point - an example that is used to justify similar occurrences at a later time precedent example, instance, illustration, representative - an item of information that is typical of a class or group; "this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome"; "there is an example on page 10"
Choosing between "case in point" or "case and point" could completely change the meaning of a sentence — especially since only "case in point" is correct.
'Case' can refer to something that serves as an example, and 'point' refers to an idea that you try to make people understand or accept. Therefore, the meaning of 'case in point' is: "an instance or example that supports, or is relevant or pertinent to, what is being discussed."
A case in point was a term used in court to describe a case related to the one being tried at the time. This phrase dates back to the middle of the sixteenth century. A case in point is anything that perfectly exemplifies an issue outside the courtroom. "Case in Point" is considered a fossil phrase.
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) was introduced with the intention of recognizing individual author contributions, reducing authorship disputes and facilitating collaboration. The idea came about following a 2012 collaborative workshop led by Harvard University and the Wellcome Trust, with input from researchers, the International Committee ...
Crude odds ratios (ORs) were based on cases and controls matched on age, sex, and calendar time. Adjusted ORs (AORs) were based on cases and controls matched on age, sex, and calendar time and adjusted for country of birth, educational level, somatic comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and sleep disorders), and psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety disorders, autism spectrum ...
And we do mean fully, in this case. In TheWrap's exclusive sneak peek at Wednesday night's episode, Jeong -- who apparently "can treat a Saturday Night Fever" -- is more confident than ever with ...
Israeli authorities have dramatically increased their use of administrative detention, a form of arbitrary detention, of Palestinians across the occupied West Bank; extended emergency measures that facilitate inhuman and degrading treatment of prisoners; and failed to investigate incidents of torture and death in custody over the past four weeks, Amnesty International said today. Since 7 ...
Violent clashes broke out in the central part of Dublin, Ireland on Thursday after a knife attack in the capital city left three children and two adults injured.
Case in point is an idiom that means an example that supports one's argument. Merriam-Webster first recorded its use 1647, and it has been a popular expression ever since. Here are few examples of case in point in sentences: "The way you dress communicates a lot about your personality, case in point, Todd's sloppy outfit today," said Todd's boss.